Sign inGet started

benchmark-methodology

by affaan-m/ECC · Research & Analysis

Scores a scoped set of competitors across nine weighted dimensions using evidence-anchored 1–5 rubrics and a strategic tension plot to produce comparable competitor profile cards.

Lift—not yet benchmarked
92
Trustsecurity · quality · license · upkeep
Scan Saferisk 0/100
LicenseMITserved via MCP

What it does

Use after competitive-platform-analysis has produced a tiered competitor set. Scores each competitor across nine weighted dimensions (positioning, voice, visual craft, offer packaging, evidence, enterprise-readiness, thought leadership, pricing, client's strategic tension) with explicit 1–5 rubrics and a tension-plot. Precedes competitive-report-structure.

#competitive-analysis#benchmarking#scoring-rubrics#market-research#positioning

Quality judgment

completeness
9.0/10
clarity
9.0/10
trigger quality
8.0/10
examples
7.0/10
structure
9.0/10
overall
9.0/10

Excellent, self-contained methodology with explicit weighted dimensions, calibrated 1–5 rubrics, evidence-collection workflow, bias controls, anti-patterns, and a precise output template. Trigger conditions and skill-chain placement are clear; only minor gaps are the absence of a worked end-to-end example card and no guidance on handling missing data or partial evidence.

Files (3)

agents/openai.yaml · 0.3 KBLICENSE · 1.0 KBSKILL.md · 9.6 KB