Sign inGet started
–

Reviews a completed coding session to identify improvements to the repo's navigation, automated checks, coding standards, and agent tooling.

Quality · GLM-5.3-flash+5.0ptsdirectional · all models →
87
Trustsecurity · quality · license · upkeep
Scan Saferisk 0/100
LicenseMITserved via MCP

What it does

Conduct a retrospective on a coding session.

#agent-workflow#automation#code-review#developer-experience#retrospective

Quality judgment

completeness
7.5/10
clarity
7.5/10
trigger quality
6.0/10
examples
3.5/10
structure
8.5/10
overall
7.0/10

Well-structured skill with clear categories, useful 'use when' triggers, and thoughtful guidance on checks vs. judgement calls. However, it lacks concrete examples of findings or output format, and the trigger relies on the user explicitly asking for a retrospective without specifying when it should proactively fire.

Files (3)

agents/openai.yaml · 0.1 KBLICENSE · 1.0 KBSKILL.md · 4.3 KB