Sign inGet started

Guides users through a structured three-stage workflow for co-authoring documentation, proposals, and specs: gathering context, refining sections iteratively, and testing the doc with a fresh reader.

Lift—not yet benchmarked
77
Trustsecurity · quality · license · upkeep
Scan Saferisk 0/100
License—metadata + link-out

What it does

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

#documentation#co-authoring#workflow#technical-specs#proposals

Quality judgment

completeness
9.0/10
clarity
9.0/10
trigger quality
8.0/10
examples
7.0/10
structure
9.0/10
overall
9.0/10

A thorough, well-organized workflow with clear stage definitions, exit conditions, environment-specific fallbacks (artifacts vs files, sub-agents vs manual testing), and graceful deviation handling. Trigger description is solid with concrete phrases, and the doc covers edge cases like alt-text and integration availability. It loses points only for lacking a concrete end-to-end worked example and occasional verbosity that could bloat context.

Files (1)

SKILL.md · 15.4 KB